The True Cost of "Terminal Time": How Your Techs Are Losing Hours to Manual Lookups

The True Cost of "Terminal Time": How Your Techs Are Losing Hours to Manual Lookups

productivityservice-centerfixed-opsroi

Recover over $162,500 a year in lost billable hours by eliminating technician "terminal time" with OnRamp's AI voice assistant.

Alex LittlewoodApril 15, 20268 min read
Listen to article

The True Cost of "Terminal Time": How Your Techs Are Losing Hours to Manual Lookups

0:0010:48
Show transcript
The True Cost of "Terminal Time": How Your Techs Are Losing Hours to Manual Lookups Recover over $162,500 a year in lost billable hours by eliminating technician "terminal time" with OnRamp's AI voice assistant. It's 10:15 on a Tuesday morning, and you've got a three-car backlog already building. You glance across the shop and do a quick headcount. Out of six techs on the clock, three of them aren't at their vehicles. One is at his bay computer scrolling through AllData for a wiring diagram. Another is on his phone, swiping through a TSB database trying to find a match. A third is at his workstation typing up RO notes from the last job before the details fade. These aren't guys slacking off. You know that. They're doing the work — the lookup, the research, the documentation that every repair demands. But none of them are turning a wrench right now. The bays are full of cars. And you're watching billable hours evaporate into screens. This plays out in shops across the country, every single day. And most managers have gotten so used to it that they've stopped seeing it as a problem. It's just how things work. But when you actually run the numbers on what "terminal time" costs your operation, the results are hard to ignore. The Math Nobody Wants to Do. Let's break it down with conservative numbers. A typical technician stops what they're doing to look something up somewhere between 10 and 20 times per day. Whether they've got their own dedicated workstation or they're pulling it up on their phone, the ritual is the same: put the tools down, clean your hands enough to operate a screen, navigate to the right database, search for the spec or diagram, find it (hopefully), then context-switch back to the vehicle and pick up where you left off. Each trip takes roughly 3 to 5 minutes. That doesn't sound like much until you multiply it out. 15 trips/day x 4 minutes average = 60 minutes lost per tech, per day At a $125/hr shop rate, that's $125 in lost billable time per tech, every single day For a 5-tech shop, that's $625/day or roughly $3,125/week Over a year? $162,500 in billable capacity that never gets billed Got 20 techs? That's $650k Charge a $175/hr shop rate? Now it's over $900k 🤯 And that's the conservative estimate. We're not even counting the context-switching tax — the mental cost of breaking focus mid-repair, losing your train of thought, and then having to re-orient when you get back to the vehicle. It's Not Just the Walk — It's the Process. Even in a well-equipped shop where every tech has their own workstation, terminal time still adds up. The bottleneck was never just about sharing a computer — it's about the process of stepping away from the vehicle, interacting with a screen-based interface, and then getting back into the flow of the repair. And when the process feels slow, techs do what any rational person would do: they skip the lookup and wing it from memory. That's when you get torque specs applied from recall that might be off. Diagnostic shortcuts that lead to comebacks. RO notes written from vague recollection instead of documented findings. Every shortcut is a potential rework job, a warranty claim rejection, or a dissatisfied customer. If your shop is still running on shared terminals, the problem is even worse — add wait time on top of lookup time, and the math gets ugly fast. But even shops that have invested in per-bay computers haven't eliminated the core issue. They've just shortened the walk. The time spent searching, reading, and typing is still there. The Flat-Rate Tech's Perspective. Here's the part that really stings for your team. If your techs are flat-rate, every minute they spend at that terminal is money directly out of their pocket. They don't get paid to look things up. They get paid to complete jobs. A tech who loses 60 minutes a day to lookups and documentation is effectively losing 5 hours a week of billable time. At a $30/hr flat-rate, that's $150/week they're not earning. Over a year, that's nearly $8,000 in take-home pay that just disappears into terminal time. Is it any wonder your best techs get frustrated? Is it any surprise that when a shop down the road offers better tools and a smoother workflow, they start listening? The Real Problem: The Access Method Hasn't Evolved. The information itself has gotten better. Mitchell1, AllData, OEM service portals, TSB databases — the data your techs need is more comprehensive and more current than it's ever been. That's not the issue. The issue is that the way techs access that information hasn't fundamentally changed since 2005. Whether it's on a shared terminal, a dedicated bay computer, or a phone in their pocket, the interaction model is the same: stop working, operate a screen, navigate menus, type a search, read the result, go back to the vehicle. The databases got better. The screens got closer. But the process — hands off the car, eyes on a screen — stayed exactly the same. We're asking technicians who work with their hands — in gloves, covered in coolant, often in awkward positions under a vehicle — to interact with software designed for someone sitting at a desk. The screen might be in the bay now instead of across the shop, but the fundamental mismatch between how techs work and how they access information hasn't changed. Practical Steps to Reduce Terminal Time Today. Before we talk about any specific tool, here are steps any manager can take right now to start clawing back some of those lost hours. Make sure every tech has dedicated screen access. If you're still running shared terminals, getting a screen into every bay — whether it's a mounted monitor or a tablet — is the minimum. It won't eliminate terminal time, but it removes the wait. Digitize your most-accessed specs. If your techs are constantly looking up the same 20 torque specs or fluid capacities for the vehicles you see most often, create quick-reference sheets and laminate them for each bay. Streamline your RO documentation process. If techs are spending 10-15 minutes per job typing notes on a keyboard, look at speech-to-text tools or simplified templates that reduce the typing burden. Track terminal time for a week. Seriously. Have someone log how many times each tech walks to the computer and roughly how long each trip takes. The data will be eye-opening. Where Voice AI Changes the Equation. All of those steps help. But they're band-aids on a fundamental design problem: technicians shouldn't have to leave the vehicle to access information. This is where voice-first AI for the bay changes everything. Instead of walking to a terminal, a tech puts on a Bluetooth headset, taps a button, and says, "What's the torque spec on the cylinder head bolts for a 2019 F-150 5.0?" The answer comes back in their ear in seconds. Hands never leave the engine. OnRamp was built specifically for this moment. It's a voice AI assistant that lives on the tech's phone and speaks through their headphones. It's trained on automotive systems, TSBs, and repair procedures — not a generic chatbot that might give you a recipe if you ask wrong. And it doesn't just answer questions. It walks techs through diagnostics, delivers step-by-step repair guidance, and then writes the RO report automatically from everything the tech said during the job. The Brain Button — a physical Bluetooth button that clips to a tech's shirt — gives them tap-to-talk, tap-to-pause control without ever touching a greasy phone screen. It's designed for gloves, for noise, for the reality of a working shop. The terminal trips don't just decrease. They disappear. The Bottom Line. Terminal time is one of those costs that's easy to ignore because it's baked into the daily routine. Nobody writes a check for it. It doesn't show up as a line item. But it shows up in your bay throughput, in your techs' paychecks, in the number of cars you push through every week, and in the frustration level of your best people. The shops that figure out how to eliminate that dead time are going to pull ahead. The math is too obvious to argue with. Here's a challenge: Track your shop's terminal time for one week. Count the trips, estimate the minutes, multiply by your shop rate. Then ask yourself what that number would look like if your techs could just ask a question out loud and get an answer in their ear without ever putting down the wrench. When you're ready to see those hours come back, book a demo with OnRamp and run the numbers for your specific shop. We hope you found this article helpful. ONRAMP is here to help your technicians work at the speed of AI. If you'd like to learn more, please schedule a demo with us. We'd love to share how your shop can drive profitability using ONRAMP.
AI Brief Summary

The True Cost of "Terminal Time": How Your Techs Are Losing Hours to Manual Lookups

0:001:36
Show transcript
This is the brief on the hidden cost of terminal time in your auto shop. Those minutes technicians spend walking away from vehicles to look up repair specs are a silent bottleneck, literally bleeding massive profits from your service center every single day. First, let's break down this staggering profit loss. A tech makes about 15 terminal trips daily. At four minutes a pop, that's an hour lost every day. For a five-tech shop billing $125 an hour, you're losing a massive $162,500 a year in unbilled capacity. Your flat rate techs also lose about eight grand in pay. So if you wouldn't physically throw 162 grand into the shop dumpster, why let it evaporate into screen time? Second, there's the root cause and the rework risk. Your databases are great, but the access method is totally outdated. It's kind of like a surgeon stopping mid-operation, taking off their sterile gloves, and walking away to check a medical textbook. Because context switching is so frustrating, techs often just guess from memory. That leads to wrong torque specs, diagnostic shortcuts, and costly comebacks. Finally, let's talk practical fixes and the AI opportunity. You might think putting a computer in every bay fixes this, but that just shortens the walk. It doesn't eliminate the costly stop. The real game changer is voice-first AI like OnRamp. Techs wear a Bluetooth headset with a physical brain button clipped right to their shirt. They literally just ask for specs out loud, get instant answers right in their ear, and keep their hands on the wrench. Challenge yourself to track your shop's terminal trips this week, because eliminating that dead screen time is the absolute fastest way to instantly reclaim thousands of dollars in billable capacity.
Listen to the Podcast

The True Cost of "Terminal Time": How Your Techs Are Losing Hours to Manual Lookups

0:009:52
Show transcript
Speaker A: Welcome to today's deep dive everyone. We are so glad you're here. Speaker B: Yeah, thanks for joining us. I'm really excited to get into this one. Speaker A: So you listening right now, you are about to look at this massive hidden cost that is just quietly draining hundreds of thousands of dollars from businesses right under their noses. Speaker B: It really is staggering when you actually look at the numbers. Speaker A: It is. It's this invisible metric called terminal time. And the craziest part of all of this, the businesses losing the most money have just accepted it as completely normal. Speaker B: Right, it's just business as usual for them. Speaker A: Exactly. So today we're zeroing in on the automotive repair industry. We're looking at this really eye-opening industry article called The True Cost of Terminal Time. Speaker B: Great piece of research, really lays it all out. Speaker A: Yeah, and the mission for this deep dive is to explore how an outdated physical workflow is just actively sabotaging modern businesses. I mean, what it reveals about this massive collision between manual labor and modern technology. Speaker B: It's a huge issue, yeah. Speaker A: Okay, let's unpack this. I want to start by just stepping right onto the shop floor. So paint this picture in your mind. Speaker B: Setting the scene. Speaker A: Right, it's 10:14 a.m. on a Tuesday. The garage doors are wide open. There's the three-car backlog choking up the lot. And out of six highly skilled technicians, three of them aren't even at their vehicles. Speaker B: Which is a major problem in a shop. Speaker A: Right. One guy is just endlessly scrolling all data on a bay computer. Another is swiping through a TSB database on his phone, and a third is typing up repair order notes from his last job. Speaker B: Yeah, and you have to understand, these techs aren't slacking off. I mean, they are doing necessary research. Speaker A: Sure, but they aren't turning a wrench. Speaker B: Exactly. Because they aren't turning a wrench, all those billable hours are basically just evaporating into screens. And that right there is terminal time. Speaker A: It's like, imagine a restaurant chef having to leave the kitchen and walk to the manager's office to check a recipe card every single time they need to add a pinch of salt. Speaker B: That's a great way to put it. Speaker A: It's insane. Why have shop managers just accepted this as normal? Speaker B: Well, what's fascinating here is how this inefficiency has simply been baked into the daily routine. I mean, it's an invisible cost. Speaker A: Because there's no line item for it. Speaker B: Right. Nobody writes a check for terminal time at the end of the month. So it's just become completely normalized over the years. Speaker A: But the financial reality of normalizing it is just brutal. We need to break down the actual math from the source. Speaker B: Well, the math is where it gets really scary. Speaker A: Yeah, because techs stop to look things up what, 10 to 20 times a day? Speaker B: Yeah, easily. Speaker A: And the physical ritual of this is so tedious. They have to put down their tools, clean their hands, walk over to the terminal, navigate the menus, and find the spec. Speaker B: And every single one of those trips takes about three to five minutes. Speaker A: Okay, so let's walk through that calculation. If you average 15 trips a day at four minutes a trip, that is 60 minutes lost per tech per day. Speaker B: An entire hour, gone. Speaker A: And at $125 an hour shop rate, a five-tech shop is losing $625 a day. That's $3,125 a week. Speaker B: Which is, yeah, it's wild. Speaker A: It scales up to a staggering $162,500 in unbilled capacity over a year. But I have to push back here for a second. Speaker B: Please, go ahead. Speaker A: Wait, does looking at a phone really take four whole minutes? We pull our phones out in 10 seconds. Speaker B: It's a fair question, but you have to consider the environment. It's not just the screen time, it's the context switching tax. Speaker A: Context switching tax. Speaker B: Yeah, it's the mental cost of breaking your focus. You're deep into a repair, right? You lose your train of thought mid-repair, and then you have to physically and mentally reorient yourself when you get back to the vehicle. Speaker A: Oh, right. Because you're holding a ton of complex info in your head. Speaker B: Exactly. You dump all that mental RAM to stare at a dropdown menu, and it takes minutes to get back into the zone once you're under the hood again. Speaker A: That makes total sense. And this doesn't just hurt the shop owner's bottom line. It actually shifts to the flat rate techs dilemma, right? Speaker B: Oh, absolutely. This system actively penalizes the workers. It takes money right out of their pockets. Speaker A: Because flat rate techs are paid to complete jobs, not to look things up. Speaker B: Exactly. If they lose five hours a week to terminal time, and say they have a $30 an hour flat rate, they're losing 150 bucks a week. Speaker A: Which means they're losing nearly $8,000 a year in take-home pay. Just to look up information. Speaker B: Yep. Just evaporated from their paychecks. Speaker A: So what does this all mean? I mean, when the process is that slow and it actively costs the worker money, rational people are going to take shortcuts. Speaker B: Of course they are. Human nature kicks in, and they just wing it from memory. Speaker A: Right. They guess the torque spec because looking it up costs them 10 bucks. Speaker B: Exactly. And the source mentions the real-world results of this. You get wrong torque specs from recalled memory, you get diagnostic shortcuts. Speaker A: Which leads to comebacks. Speaker B: Yeah. Customers bringing the car back because it wasn't fixed right. Speaker A: Yeah, comebacks, rejected warranty claims, and incredibly badly written RO notes because they rushed through the typing at the end of the day. Speaker B: It's a cascade of failures. And this raises an important question regarding employee retention. Speaker A: Oh, sure. Good techs won't put up with it. Speaker B: Right. Frustrated top-tier techs will simply leave. They'll pack up and go to a shop down the road that actually offers better tools and smoother workflows. Speaker A: So the stakes are massive for everyone. Which leads me to wonder, why hasn't this been solved? Like, we have incredible technology today. Speaker B: We do, but the core mismatch is that the information evolved, but the access method didn't. Speaker A: Meaning the data itself is fine. Speaker B: Oh, the data is great. Systems like Mitchell 1, the OEM portals, they are fantastic. But the interaction model is stuck in 2005. Speaker A: Because they're still forced to use screens. Speaker B: Right. Techs are required to take their hands off the car and put their eyes on a screen. Speaker A: It's just absurd. We are asking people wearing gloves, covered in coolant, physically contorted under a chassis to use software designed for someone sitting at an air-conditioned desk. Speaker B: It really is a massive disconnect. And if we connect this to the bigger picture, this isn't just an automotive issue. Speaker A: No. Speaker B: It's a fundamental failure in how we build tech for manual blue-collar environments across the board. Speaker A: I mean, I guess shop owners try to fix it by putting a computer in every single bay. Speaker B: Sure, but that just shortens the walk. It doesn't eliminate the stop-and-type process. The friction is still there. Speaker A: So what do we do? Let's talk about stop gaps versus the actual paradigm shift. What can shops do right now? Speaker B: Well, there are some immediate band-aids. Like you mentioned, ensuring dedicated screen access in every bay is a start. Speaker A: Okay, what else? Speaker B: Laminating quick reference sheets for the top 20 most used specs is a great analog trick. And using speech-to-text on tablets for those RO notes. Speaker A: Yeah, that would save some typing time at least. Speaker B: And tracking or logging terminal time just to see the raw data so management understands the scope of the problem. Speaker A: Those are solid stop gaps. But here's where it gets really interesting. Speaker B: Oh, definitely. Speaker A: There is a real solution now. It's a game-changer called Onramp. It's this voice-first AI built specifically for the bay. Speaker B: This is where things get futuristic, but in a very practical way. Speaker A: Right. So the way Onramp works, according to the article, is the tech wears a Bluetooth headset. And they have this thing called the brain button. It's a physical button clipped to their shirt, and it's designed to be pressed with dirty gloves on. Speaker B: That is so smart. Removing the touchscreen entirely. Speaker A: Exactly. So the tech just taps the brain button and asks a highly specific question without ever leaving the engine block. Speaker B: Like what kind of question? Speaker A: They can literally say, what's the torque spec on the cylinder head bolts for a 2019 F-150 5.0? Speaker B: Oh, wow. And it just tells them. Speaker A: Yep. The exact answer is delivered right into their ear in seconds. Speaker B: Now, I have to emphasize something really important here. Onramp isn't just some generic chatbot. Speaker A: Right, it's not like asking your phone's default assistant. Speaker B: Exactly. If you prompt a generic AI wrong, it might confidently give you a recipe for pancakes instead of a torque spec. Speaker A: Or guess the wrong spec entirely and cause an engine block to crack. Speaker B: Right, which is dangerous. Speaker A: Yeah. Speaker B: But Onramp is trained specifically on automotive systems. It can actually walk techs through complex diagnostics step-by-step. Speaker A: That is wild. Speaker B: And even better, it automatically writes the RO report based on what the tech says out loud during the actual job. Speaker A: So they don't have to sit down at 5:00 p.m. and try to remember what they did to five different cars. Speaker B: Nope. It's all logged automatically. The trips to the terminal don't just decrease, they completely disappear. Speaker A: The friction is just gone. Which brings us to the core takeaway here. Terminal time is a silent killer of throughput and paychecks. Speaker B: It really is. And honestly, tracking it for just one week will prove the math to any shop owner who doesn't believe it. Speaker A: Yeah. And I want to turn this to you, the listener. Think about your own daily life or your own industry. Where does terminal time exist for you? Speaker B: That's a great point. Everyone has it. Speaker A: Right. Where are you breaking your workflow just to retrieve basic information from some clunky system? Speaker B: It's everywhere once you start looking for it. And it leaves us with this final kind of provocative thought. Speaker A: Let's hear it. Speaker B: If domain-specific AI like Onramp can completely remove the physical friction of accessing information for manual workers, how long until physical screens disappear entirely? Speaker A: Wow. From everywhere. Speaker B: Think about it. In workshops, hospitals, factory floors, replaced entirely by a continuous, invisible, hands-free auditory overlay. Speaker A: A world without screens for manual workers. Just voice and knowledge right when you need it. That is incredible to think about. Speaker B: It really changes everything. Speaker A: It really does. Well, thank you so much for joining us on this deep dive. Speaker B: Yeah, thanks for having me and thanks to everyone listening. Speaker A: We will catch you on the next one.
Share:

It's 10:15 on a Tuesday morning, and you've got a three-car backlog already building. You glance across the shop and do a quick headcount. Out of six techs on the clock, three of them aren't at their vehicles. One is at his bay computer scrolling through AllData for a wiring diagram. Another is on his phone, swiping through a TSB database trying to find a match. A third is at his workstation typing up RO notes from the last job before the details fade.

These aren't guys slacking off. You know that. They're doing the work — the lookup, the research, the documentation that every repair demands. But none of them are turning a wrench right now. The bays are full of cars. And you're watching billable hours evaporate into screens.

This plays out in shops across the country, every single day. And most managers have gotten so used to it that they've stopped seeing it as a problem. It's just how things work. But when you actually run the numbers on what "terminal time" costs your operation, the results are hard to ignore.

The Math Nobody Wants to Do

Let's break it down with conservative numbers.

A typical technician stops what they're doing to look something up somewhere between 10 and 20 times per day. Whether they've got their own dedicated workstation or they're pulling it up on their phone, the ritual is the same: put the tools down, clean your hands enough to operate a screen, navigate to the right database, search for the spec or diagram, find it (hopefully), then context-switch back to the vehicle and pick up where you left off.

Each trip takes roughly 3 to 5 minutes. That doesn't sound like much until you multiply it out.

  • 15 trips/day x 4 minutes average = 60 minutes lost per tech, per day
  • At a $125/hr shop rate, that's $125 in lost billable time per tech, every single day
  • For a 5-tech shop, that's $625/day or roughly $3,125/week
  • Over a year? $162,500 in billable capacity that never gets billed
  • Got 20 techs? That's $650k
  • Charge a $175/hr shop rate? Now it's over $900k 🤯

And that's the conservative estimate. We're not even counting the context-switching tax — the mental cost of breaking focus mid-repair, losing your train of thought, and then having to re-orient when you get back to the vehicle.

It's Not Just the Walk — It's the Process

Even in a well-equipped shop where every tech has their own workstation, terminal time still adds up. The bottleneck was never just about sharing a computer — it's about the process of stepping away from the vehicle, interacting with a screen-based interface, and then getting back into the flow of the repair.

And when the process feels slow, techs do what any rational person would do: they skip the lookup and wing it from memory. That's when you get torque specs applied from recall that might be off. Diagnostic shortcuts that lead to comebacks. RO notes written from vague recollection instead of documented findings. Every shortcut is a potential rework job, a warranty claim rejection, or a dissatisfied customer.

If your shop is still running on shared terminals, the problem is even worse — add wait time on top of lookup time, and the math gets ugly fast. But even shops that have invested in per-bay computers haven't eliminated the core issue. They've just shortened the walk. The time spent searching, reading, and typing is still there.

The Flat-Rate Tech's Perspective

Here's the part that really stings for your team. If your techs are flat-rate, every minute they spend at that terminal is money directly out of their pocket. They don't get paid to look things up. They get paid to complete jobs.

A tech who loses 60 minutes a day to lookups and documentation is effectively losing 5 hours a week of billable time. At a $30/hr flat-rate, that's $150/week they're not earning. Over a year, that's nearly $8,000 in take-home pay that just disappears into terminal time.

Is it any wonder your best techs get frustrated? Is it any surprise that when a shop down the road offers better tools and a smoother workflow, they start listening?

The Real Problem: The Access Method Hasn't Evolved

The information itself has gotten better. Mitchell1, AllData, OEM service portals, TSB databases — the data your techs need is more comprehensive and more current than it's ever been. That's not the issue.

The issue is that the way techs access that information hasn't fundamentally changed since 2005. Whether it's on a shared terminal, a dedicated bay computer, or a phone in their pocket, the interaction model is the same: stop working, operate a screen, navigate menus, type a search, read the result, go back to the vehicle. The databases got better. The screens got closer. But the process — hands off the car, eyes on a screen — stayed exactly the same.

We're asking technicians who work with their hands — in gloves, covered in coolant, often in awkward positions under a vehicle — to interact with software designed for someone sitting at a desk. The screen might be in the bay now instead of across the shop, but the fundamental mismatch between how techs work and how they access information hasn't changed.

Practical Steps to Reduce Terminal Time Today

Before we talk about any specific tool, here are steps any manager can take right now to start clawing back some of those lost hours.

Make sure every tech has dedicated screen access. If you're still running shared terminals, getting a screen into every bay — whether it's a mounted monitor or a tablet — is the minimum. It won't eliminate terminal time, but it removes the wait.

Digitize your most-accessed specs. If your techs are constantly looking up the same 20 torque specs or fluid capacities for the vehicles you see most often, create quick-reference sheets and laminate them for each bay.

Streamline your RO documentation process. If techs are spending 10-15 minutes per job typing notes on a keyboard, look at speech-to-text tools or simplified templates that reduce the typing burden.

Track terminal time for a week. Seriously. Have someone log how many times each tech walks to the computer and roughly how long each trip takes. The data will be eye-opening.

Where Voice AI Changes the Equation

All of those steps help. But they're band-aids on a fundamental design problem: technicians shouldn't have to leave the vehicle to access information.

This is where voice-first AI for the bay changes everything. Instead of walking to a terminal, a tech puts on a Bluetooth headset, taps a button, and says, "What's the torque spec on the cylinder head bolts for a 2019 F-150 5.0?" The answer comes back in their ear in seconds. Hands never leave the engine.

OnRamp was built specifically for this moment. It's a voice AI assistant that lives on the tech's phone and speaks through their headphones. It's trained on automotive systems, TSBs, and repair procedures — not a generic chatbot that might give you a recipe if you ask wrong. And it doesn't just answer questions. It walks techs through diagnostics, delivers step-by-step repair guidance, and then writes the RO report automatically from everything the tech said during the job.

The Brain Button — a physical Bluetooth button that clips to a tech's shirt — gives them tap-to-talk, tap-to-pause control without ever touching a greasy phone screen. It's designed for gloves, for noise, for the reality of a working shop.

The terminal trips don't just decrease. They disappear.

The Bottom Line

Terminal time is one of those costs that's easy to ignore because it's baked into the daily routine. Nobody writes a check for it. It doesn't show up as a line item. But it shows up in your bay throughput, in your techs' paychecks, in the number of cars you push through every week, and in the frustration level of your best people.

The shops that figure out how to eliminate that dead time are going to pull ahead. The math is too obvious to argue with.

Here's a challenge: Track your shop's terminal time for one week. Count the trips, estimate the minutes, multiply by your shop rate. Then ask yourself what that number would look like if your techs could just ask a question out loud and get an answer in their ear without ever putting down the wrench.

When you're ready to see those hours come back, book a demo with OnRamp and run the numbers for your specific shop.

Curious how ONRAMP handles this in real shops?

See How It Works

Want to learn more about ONRAMP?

Drop your details and we'll get back to you with a personalized walkthrough.

You may also like